This episode’s vocabulary
Superior
adj. — better than average or better than other people or things of the same type.
Detriment
noun — harm or damage.
Dry up
phrasal verb — to no longer exist or be available.
To display
verb — to show something.
Aptitude
noun — a natural ability or skill.
To pigeonhole
verb — to put someone or something into a group or type, often unfairly.
To label
verb — to label something or someone is also to name that thing’s or person’s character.
To flourish
verb — to grow or develop successfully.
Novelty
noun — the quality of being new and unusual.
Vicariously
adverb — in a vicarious way (= experienced through the activities of other people, rather than by doing something yourself).
To relate
verb — to find or show the connection between two or more things.
Relatable
adj. — related, or able to be related to something else.
Productive
adj. — resulting in or providing a large amount or supply of something.
Inclination
noun — a preference or tendency, or a feeling that makes a person want to do something.
To expose
verb — to create conditions that allow someone the opportunity to do, learn, or experience something.
Questions and answers
Rory, how might a person who is considered to be a genius feel?
Well, that's a good question because I don't know many people who would be considered to be that way. However, I imagine they would probably feel a great deal of pressure to succeed maybe from other people or from themselves, they might have a great drive to succeed. Um, and they might feel superior to other people if they're doing really well, but other people aren't doing as well.
Do you think artists with talents should focus on their talents only?
If you mean focus on their talents to like the detriment of everything else, then no, it's probably not such a good idea. If you're only good at one narrow thing and don't develop skills in other areas, then it's going to be rather dull life, isn't it? Um, moreover, what if your talent or work opportunities in your area of expertise dry up? It's better to have a key skill, and then some backups on hand just in case.
And how can they develop their key skills?
Well, by practicing, that's how you develop anything.
Is it possible for us to know whether young children will become musicians or painters when they grow up?
Well, they might display some sort of natural aptitude for art before they even hit adulthood. Um, or they could even just express an interest in those areas. But it's probably not a good idea to pigeonhole children and label them before they're ready.
Do you think that the government should support these children who are like genius children?
Well, it will depend on the individual country and if they have the resources available, but let's assume that they do, then yes, and probably their education system, if it's functioning correctly, should do that it should be flexible enough to allow them to flourish, while other people are doing the baseline.
Why do people like to watch talent shows?
Well, why do people like to watch anything? It's the novelty of the experience, I suppose. You can see people doing things that you've never seen before, or the very least you've never tried yourself, and you can sort of live vicariously through them.
Do you think talent shows are popular in general?
Well, if viewing figures are anything to go by, then yes, and the newspaper coverage seems to indicate that it's quite popular.
Do you think that different talent shows will be popular in the future? Or it will be even more popular in the future?
I don't know how they would be different, because they're always different talents. Maybe the format might change, maybe audience participation? Anyway, I don't know if different ones will be popular. But certainly, the concept of talent shows will be popular.
Do you think it's more interesting to watch famous people or ordinary people's shows?
I think it depends on what you want to focus on. It shows about famous people tend to focus on big events and drama and major issues, while ordinary people have their own quieter personal dramas, which are more relatable to draw people's focus.
And why do you think some people dislike watching ordinary people's lives on TV?
Why they like it or why they dislike it?
Dislike them.
Well, I imagine because it seems more productive use of time to develop your own talents, rather than looking at other people. Well, rather than looking at other people developing theirs. Um, so yes, in this perspective, it seems better for them to work on themselves.
Some people say that you're born with certain talents, would you agree?
Well, you're maybe born with a natural inclination in that direction, but talents will come about through practice. And if they don't use it, then it will just remain an inclination to do something. There are very few people who just do something well without practice. In fact, I don't think there are any.
But do you think talents could be developed, even if people are not born with it?
Yes. Because, well, you're probably not born with like a specific talent. You're maybe just born with a strong interest in that particular direction. And then that leads you to practice more and more and more earlier and earlier. I mean, it's like the difference between native speaking and non-native speaking teachers, for example, or people. Native-speaking people have been doing it since they were born. And so of course, it seems like they're naturally talented with the language but you know, it's not naturally talented. It's just they've been exposed to it for longer whereas non-native speaking people have not. So yes, you can develop this. In fact, it's the only way.
Thank you, Rory, for your talented answers, as always! -